본문

Old Testament quotations in the Synoptic Gospels, and the two-document hypothesis
Old Testament quotations in the Synoptic Gospels, and the two-document hypothesis
내용보기
Old Testament quotations in the Synoptic Gospels, and the two-document hypothesis
자료유형  
 전자책
 
INN60679
ISBN  
9780315606791
DDC  
226-22
청구기호  
PQDT UMI 2016-01-00349
저자명  
New, David Stewart.
서명/저자  
Old Testament quotations in the Synoptic Gospels, and the two-document hypothesis
발행사항  
Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertations Publishing, 1990
형태사항  
312 p
주기사항  
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-10, Section: A, page: 3633.
주기사항  
Supervisor: S. R. Westerholm.
학위논문주기  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--McMaster University (Canada), 1990.
초록/해제  
The two-document hypothesis (involving the claim that Mark is a source for Matthew and Luke) has long been regarded by the majority of New Testament scholars as firmly established. Recently its status has been challenged by proponents of the Griesbach hypothesis (by which Matthew is a source for Luke and Mark). Since much gospel research depends on the validity of the two-document hypothesis, resolution is urgently needed.
초록/해제  
In 1863 Heinrich Julius Holtzmann argued that an examination of the Old Testament quotations in these three gospels would favour the two-document position. His argument depends on the existence of two groups of quotations in Matthew: those of Septuagintal text-type which Matthew copied from Mark, and those similar to the Hebrew, which Matthew preferred when on his own. My research indicates that these two groups cannot be clearly demarcated. Some quotations peculiar to Matthew are Septuagintal, and on only four occasions do Matthew and Mark both quote the Septuagint verbatim.
초록/해제  
Because grouping quotations by text-type proved inconclusive, a second method was used. A detailed comparison was made of the text of quotations which occur in more than one gospel. Then each of the two major positions in turn was assumed, to determine which would best explain the texts of the gospels for each quotation. The two-document position had a decided edge (in those cases where a decision was possible).
초록/해제  
In addition to helping to confirm the two-document hypothesis, this research resulted in two significant observations. First, Matthew follows his sources with great care. Second, even when quoting the Old Testament on his own, Matthew seems to rely for the most part on some form of the Septuagint. In combination, these two observations suggest that Matthew may have used a form of the Septuagint which in places was assimilated toward the Hebrew.
일반주제명  
Biblical studies,
기타저자  
McMaster University (Canada).
기본자료저록  
Dissertation Abstracts International. 52-10A.
전자적 위치 및 접속  
로그인 후 이용바랍니다.
Control Number  
kjcl:394989

소장정보

  • 예약
  • 추천도서
  • 서가에 없는 책 신고
  • 나의폴더
소장자료
등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
EB12336 PQDT UMI E-Book 대출가능 대출가능
추천도서 마이폴더 부재도서신고

* 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.